[ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process
johnl at iecc.com
Fri May 22 17:31:18 PDT 2009
>Surely you do not suppose that a signature which covers only the From
>header (and that is a perfectly valis signature according to the
>document) is to be accepted as equally valuable to a signature that
Probably not, but that's because a dimwit who puts on cruddy
signatures is unlikely to earn a very good reputation. I really
REALLY do not plan to waste any time inventing heuristics to evaluate
the "quality" of a DKIM signature and I doubt anyone else does,
either. If you want people to accept your mail, be sure to sign only
good mail, and be sure to sign it in a way that bad guys can't fake.
>It is Blatantly Obvious!
Some things that are Blatantly Obvious are also Just Plain Wrong.
More information about the ietf-dkim