[ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

On Mon, 11 May 2009, John Levine wrote:
> Any idea what they're doing with it?  Having added some support for DKIM 
> to majordomo2, I am more convinced than ever that the motivation for l=, 
> list recipients will filter list mail using the contributor's signature 
> rather than the list signature, is just wrong.

I'll ask the person who submitted the patches, and also ask if anyone else 
is using them.

> If I may pile on, let me reiterate Dave's point about q=.  In the
> unlikely event that we invent another way to look for key records,
> that's the time to design the syntax to specify it.

Yep, I agree.