[ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at sendmail.com
Mon May 11 08:47:02 PDT 2009
On Mon, 11 May 2009, John Levine wrote:
> Any idea what they're doing with it? Having added some support for DKIM
> to majordomo2, I am more convinced than ever that the motivation for l=,
> list recipients will filter list mail using the contributor's signature
> rather than the list signature, is just wrong.
I'll ask the person who submitted the patches, and also ask if anyone else
is using them.
> If I may pile on, let me reiterate Dave's point about q=. In the
> unlikely event that we invent another way to look for key records,
> that's the time to design the syntax to specify it.
Yep, I agree.
More information about the ietf-dkim