[ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process
johnl at iecc.com
Mon May 11 01:36:04 PDT 2009
>> l: Body length count
>Despite the warnings we've posted about it, at least one site has
>contributed patches to our implementation that extends its basic utility.
>That means there's at least a little demand for its use.
Any idea what they're doing with it? Having added some support for
DKIM to majordomo2, I am more convinced than ever that the motivation
for l=, list recipients will filter list mail using the contributor's
signature rather than the list signature, is just wrong.
If I may pile on, let me reiterate Dave's point about q=. In the
unlikely event that we invent another way to look for key records,
that's the time to design the syntax to specify it.
More information about the ietf-dkim