[ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?

[Eliot Lear]

On 5/8/09 7:07 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
> I hadn't noticed anyone suggesting doing anything that cycled the specification
> at Proposed.  (The requirement placed on the Errata is different than we're
> discussing for the -bis effort.)
>
> Have you heard otherwise?
>
>    

That would be me.  Refer to recent messages, please.  The standard, 
IMHO, is not sufficiently baked, given the recent change.

Eliot