[ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?
lear at cisco.com
Wed May 6 09:00:53 PDT 2009
Although it seems that I'm on the other side of the issue from Jim, I'm
don't think the below is quite fair.
On 5/6/09 5:50 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> And just to keep things real, can you cite some examples of the effect you are
> concerned about?
If we accept the existing dogma that draft indicates "more stable" and
that Proposed indicates "less", then Jim shouldn't have to answer the
above question because he is operating under that dogma. That's a more
fundamental debate that should take place elsewhere (and has, to no
More information about the ietf-dkim