[ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?
lear at cisco.com
Mon May 4 12:26:15 PDT 2009
On 5/4/09 9:17 PM, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
>>> 2. On whether to move to draft standard
>>> While I was initially in favor of this, I am now uncomfortable doing
>>> based on the lengthy debate we just concluded about errata. To me the
>> Qualified approval based on consensus gained in the -bis draft.
> If I understand Suresh correctly, that the Standard draft would be
> based on
> bis, +1.
Confusion has set in. One moves to draft standard when the proposed
standard has been stable for at least six months. Given that we just
essentially updated it, we can't possibly claim that.
More information about the ietf-dkim