[ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata

[Jim Fenton]

Barry Leiba wrote:
> Apart from the item that resulted in the "errata" draft, now heading
> to the IESG as an update to 4871, there are a bunch of other
> non-controversial errata that Pasi needs a response to.  Will the 4871
> authors please handle those, so the working group and Pasi can clear
> them?
>   

I'd need to go back through the archives, but I thought the authors had
already "nodded in agreement" to a number of the non-controversial
errata, and we had discussed that at IETF 73.  What's the process to
clear the obvious ones?

-Jim