[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt
jdfalk-lists at cybernothing.org
Wed Apr 22 10:39:17 PDT 2009
Barry Leiba wrote:
> There is consensus -- not unanimous agreement, but rough consensus --
> in the working group that the document we're processing is a
> reasonable effort at clarifying things for implementors who don't have
> the benefit of ready access to discuss things with the original
> authors/editors. Because we've been here and moved on, the topic of
> whether we need to make changes to the definitions at this point... is
> off the table.
> Let's save that energy for the RFC4871bis effort.
> Barry (as chair)
Return Path Inc
More information about the ietf-dkim