[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt

[J.D. Falk]

Barry Leiba wrote:

> There is consensus -- not unanimous agreement, but rough consensus --
> in the working group that the document we're processing is a
> reasonable effort at clarifying things for implementors who don't have
> the benefit of ready access to discuss things with the original
> authors/editors.  Because we've been here and moved on, the topic of
> whether we need to make changes to the definitions at this point... is
> off the table.
>
> Let's save that energy for the RFC4871bis effort.
>
> Barry (as chair)

Thank you.

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/