[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt
mike at mtcc.com
Tue Apr 21 11:36:58 PDT 2009
Al Iverson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael Thomas <mike at mtcc.com> wrote:
>> I continue to be amazed at how utterly useless this document is, and
>> more so that people are being asked to break a sweat to issue it. The
>> most serious error is that it is a solution in search of a problem.
>> Is there *one* person/organization here who can say that this text
>> changed or affected their implementation in any way?
> Yes. It hasn't affected our current implementation, but it will help
> to guide me on implementation choices I make in the future.
Please elaborate how. Especially valuable would be examples of where
your code would have not been interoperable before this errata, but
would conform in the future. Barring that, a list of any changes to
operational behavior would be nifty.
More information about the ietf-dkim