[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Al Iverson wrote:
>> I continue to be amazed at how utterly useless this document is, and
>> more so that people are being asked to break a sweat to issue it. The
>> most serious error is that it is a solution in search of a problem.
>>
>> Is there *one* person/organization here who can say that this text
>> changed or affected their implementation in any way?
>
> Yes. It hasn't affected our current implementation, but it will help
> to guide me on implementation choices I make in the future.

I wouldn't be surprised to find that people on this list realize no 
substantial benefit from the text changes proposed.  But then, the 
intended audience of the RFC and errata is much larger than the population 
of this list.

So it may not help "us", but I could see how it might help "them".