[ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)

[J.D. Falk]

Siegel, Ellen wrote:
>
>>> I agree with Doug's point here.  The problem is that the more I think
>>> about it, the more I think it's a mistake for us to put MUA advice
>>> into the standards-track documents, and I'm inclined, rather, to want
>>> to remove what's there rather than to change it.
>> +1
>>
>   +1

+1

I don't completely agree with John, though -- I think this group /could/ 
come up with a fairly sane set of recommendations for MUA developers who 
want to display information based on DKIM results, so long as we're careful 
to confine it to what the results mean to end recipients and not get into 
whether the buttons should be painted periwinkle or mauve -- but if we do, 
it has to be a separate informational document.

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/