[ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor
lear at cisco.com
Wed Mar 25 22:53:05 PDT 2009
On 3/25/09 10:28 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> Eliot Lear wrote:
>>> 8. RFC4871 Section 2.11 Identity Assessor
>>> The name of the module that consumes DKIM's mandatory
>>> payload, the
>>> responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). Other DKIM
>>> can also be delivered this module; however this additional
>>> is outside the scope of the DKIM signature specification.
>> Replace "Other DKIM values" to "Other information".
>> My logic: what the assessor consumes beyond the SDID is outside the
>> scope of the spec.
> Is your concern that the presence of the DKIM qualifier could be taken
> to /exclude/ other values?
> The reason for saying DKIM, here, was to make sure the reader knows
> it's ok for other DKIM-Sig values to be delivered. Without the DKIM
> reference, the sentence would seem to be so broad as to have truly
> nothing to do with DKIM.
My concern is this: what do identity assessors use today? An IP
address. They might want that tidbid of information as well. How,
then, not to exclude it?
More information about the ietf-dkim