[ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

I'd probably say 'freudian slip' for that.  And +1 for text with
Ellen's change below.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Siegel, Ellen
<esiegel at constantcontact.com> wrote:

> Can you explain why you used "dedicated to the assessment of the delivered name" rather than "... of the delivered identifier"? I can live with it either way, but it seems strange to say that it consumes an identifier but assesses a name.
>
> Aside from that, it looks fine to me.