[ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus

[Steve Atkins]

On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:

> Steve Atkins wrote:
>> It's the existence of it that's a bad idea. The sole redeeming  
>> feature
>> is that it's optional, and so receivers can treat any signature  
>> with l=
>> as invalid, with no risk of affecting mail sent by competent senders.
>
> Not according to the Crocker-Levine axis. All your decisions are
> belong to them.

I don't get your point. Could you clarify?

Cheers,
   Steve