[ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata

[Stephen Farrell]

Jim Fenton wrote:
> Dave CROCKER wrote:
>> Are there other changes to draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata being proposed?
>>   
> 
> I believe the Chairs requested that the other, non-controversial, errata
> be incorporated into this draft.  

I think we suggested it as an option rather than requested.

> Is that (editorial) work ongoing?

I think it'd be great if Dave were willing to do that, but I could
understand if he'd rather not.

S.

> 
> -Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>