[ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Tue Mar 10 04:52:41 PDT 2009
You have suggested that many times. The WG and
the BoFs before it always disagreed. End of story
as far as I'm concerned unless *many* of those
that want it as standards-track now indicate
a change of mind.
Again, please stop. This is unproductive and
totally distracting the WG from progressing
with the 4871 errata,
John Levine wrote:
>> Please stop all this ADSP "good"/ADSP "bad" repetition.
> I am specifically proposing that we withdraw it as
> standards track and resubmit it as experimental,
> because that's what it is.
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
More information about the ietf-dkim