[ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental

[Stephen Farrell]

You have suggested that many times. The WG and
the BoFs before it always disagreed. End of story
as far as I'm concerned unless *many* of those
that want it as standards-track now indicate
a change of mind.

Again, please stop. This is unproductive and
totally distracting the WG from progressing
with the 4871 errata,

Stephen.

John Levine wrote:
>> Please stop all this ADSP "good"/ADSP "bad" repetition.
> 
> I am specifically proposing that we withdraw it as
> standards track and resubmit it as experimental,
> because that's what it is.
> 
> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>