[ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification

[Steve Atkins]

I'm not impressed by any of the options, but I think the erratum is  
the least bad.

So....

> (b) The erratum I-D [1] is the way to go, but needs work.
>    (Then specify your changes in "NEW"/"OLD" style.)

OLD:

     ... permitting a person, role or organization that owns the signing
     domain to claim responsibility

NEW:

Either

     ... permitting a signing domain to claim responsibility

or

     ... permitting a person, role or organization that owns the signing
     domain to claim responsibility, either directly or via a proxy to  
whom
     they have delegated that authority.


I don't have any strong emotional attachment to this change, and would  
be content to be counted as (a) if nobody else considers this change  
worthwhile.

Cheers,
   Steve