[ietf-dkim] a protocol needs a payload

Murray S. Kucherawy msk at sendmail.com
Tue Feb 17 15:41:17 PST 2009


On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jim Fenton wrote:
> But -rfc4871-errata-02 defines this backwards.  The erratum makes 
> everything else internals, which eliminates a lot of information that 
> might be useful to a downstream assessor.  For example:
> [...]

Perhaps this is a terminology question.

In a DNS reply, is the "answer" section the payload, or does the payload 
include the header (e.g. the answer count, the authority count, the 
additional count, some flags)?


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list