[ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification

Wietse Venema wietse at porcupine.org
Mon Feb 16 12:05:15 PST 2009


Stephen Farrell:
> (a) The erratum I-D [1] is ready to go. Process it.

Motivation:

Adding tweaks to a confusing document does not remove the confusion
(you can consider this my variant of Brooks's law).

Confusion is removed by stating clear terms up-front, and by casting
the discussion into those terms.

	Wietse


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list