[ietf-dkim] Requesting working group LastCall on: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02
lear at cisco.com
Fri Feb 13 05:19:49 PST 2009
would any of the people who are saying +1 please answer the following
1. Beyond confusion surround i=, what is the interoperability problem?
2. Is it possible to correct the problem without additional text?
A reference to a previous message that answers these questions would be
More information about the ietf-dkim