[ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque"

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Al Iverson <aiverson at spamresource.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I personally think "opaque" is an appropriate term. It's a pretty
> common use of the term. However, I am likely going to be fine with
> suggested replacement text.
>

+1 for opaque. People seeking alternatives are cordially requested to
consult a copy of Websters Thesaurus.

srs