[ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque"
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 07:31:31 PST 2009
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Al Iverson <aiverson at spamresource.com> wrote:
> I personally think "opaque" is an appropriate term. It's a pretty
> common use of the term. However, I am likely going to be fine with
> suggested replacement text.
+1 for opaque. People seeking alternatives are cordially requested to
consult a copy of Websters Thesaurus.
More information about the ietf-dkim