[ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jan 27 08:55:07 PST 2009
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Jeff Macdonald
<jmacdonald at e-dialog.com> wrote:
> I'd still think even given that model, you'd let the actions of the i=
> determine the trustworthness of the steam independent of what the owner
> of d= claims.
Always crosscheck, is a good general rule. But let's put it this way
.. if I trust you enough to even look at your i= (let alone engage in
the contortions of d= and i= permutations and combinations that ADSP
would require) then I dont need to keep more than a general eye on
your mail stream.
Especially as I know its backed by a feedback loop where you will be
alerted about issues and deal with them (we at outblaze tie our loop
to a strong whitelist, and you cant get a loop unless we whitelist you
.. so we have been using that reputation model early on).
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
More information about the ietf-dkim