[ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Jan 26 09:42:03 PST 2009
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Michael Adkins
<michael.adkins at corp.aol.com> wrote:
> Would it make more sense to suggest that the mail system make the UAID
> clear to the reader if its the identity whose reputation was used to
> deliver the message, and make the SDID clear to the reader otherwise?
The RFC seems to steer clear from it beyond emphasizing the
differences between sdid / uaid.
Maybe just leave this for the use case document I suggested? If it is
inappropriate for an RFC, it could be produced as a maawg document.
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
More information about the ietf-dkim