[ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871

[Dave CROCKER]

Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Separately, is the best route from here to do a 4871bis
> (assuming the 5378 mess gets sorted), that incorporates
> all agreed errata to date? If not, then what?

Stephen,

The intent for this effort was to issue it as an Errata entry, per 
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php>.

The changes are narrow and few.  We really don't need to generate a brand new 
RFC just for this.  Or at least, not yet, IMO.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net