[ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871
dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Jan 26 07:07:29 PST 2009
Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Separately, is the best route from here to do a 4871bis
> (assuming the 5378 mess gets sorted), that incorporates
> all agreed errata to date? If not, then what?
The intent for this effort was to issue it as an Errata entry, per
The changes are narrow and few. We really don't need to generate a brand new
RFC just for this. Or at least, not yet, IMO.
More information about the ietf-dkim