[ietf-dkim] Next steps for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp

[Stephen Farrell]

John L wrote:
> That would be fine with me, but what it says now is that the i= MUST match 
> the From: address.  As I've said a few times, that's clearly wrong, but I 
> got shouted down in the past when I tried to change it.

Without getting into the merits of the argument (and I don't think we
should do all that again), the document does currently reflect the
WG's rough consensus so let's keep this to adding clarifications as
Pasi requested and not try re-open issues now after the end of IETF
LC.

Stephen.