[ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt]

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

ietf-dkim-request at mipassoc.org wrote:
> The draft doesn't specify a discussion venue.  I believe the plan is to request 
> Informational RFC status.
>
> With respect to the IETF, is there a better place for discussion than the DKIM list?
>   

mail-vet-discuss?

I don't imagine A-R will be there a whole lot longer, but I could be wrong.