[ietf-dkim] [Interop] Adding a 'consultants' page to dkim.org

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> These are independently managed lists.  Merging is possible, of course, 
> but we should get some pretty strong consensus to do that, I think.

They remain ambiguous if not.  But anyway, there's my vote in the hopes of 
creating some consensus. :)

>>   I'd say this is the general list for questions about deployment and 
>> operations.  This is where I believe questions about reputation and 
>> multiple signatures should be discussed, except where those coversations 
>> relate directly to standardization or development/testing.
>
> Ewww. "reputation"?  No, I hope not.  For the moment, we are only 
> talking about the mechanics of creating and interpreting DKIM 
> signatures.

I'm referring mainly to general public questions about "How do I tie this 
to reputation?"  Not our industry debates; those go on MAAWG or IETF lists 
as they have been.

> Anyhow, is the ops list where the water-cooler self-help consulting 
> should take place?

That's what I believe, yes.

>> Are there other potential discussions that wouldn't be covered by these 
>> which warrant having their own venues?
>
> That's my question, yes.

I can't think of any.  If such did appear, separate venues could be 
created.