[ietf-dkim] [Interop] Adding a 'consultants' page to dkim.org
dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Sep 30 12:56:02 PDT 2008
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>> I'd like to clarify the role of a new 'users' list from the DKIM lists
>> that already exist. The existing ones are:
> I'm guessing that's ietf-dkim.
yes. (sorry I didn't provide the pointers.)
> I assume this is dkim-dev and dkim-testers.
> I think these two overlap
> enough that they should be merged. It's for people who are developing, or
> have developed, DKIM applications so that they can benefit from the
> experience of others and arrange for interoperability testing.
These are independently managed lists. Merging is possible, of course, but we
should get some pretty strong consensus to do that, I think.
> Not sure which this one is (dkim-ops?).
> I'd say this is the general list
> for questions about deployment and operations. This is where I believe
> questions about reputation and multiple signatures should be discussed,
> except where those coversations relate directly to standardization or
Ewww. "reputation"? No, I hope not. For the moment, we are only talking about
the mechanics of creating and interpreting DKIM signatures.
I would *very* strongly hope that discussion about the use of domain names for
making quality assessments (reputation) would be on an entirely different list.
(And, yes, we might need to create one.)
Anyhow, is the ops list where the water-cooler self-help consulting should take
> Are there other potential discussions that wouldn't be covered by these
> which warrant having their own venues?
That's my question, yes.
More information about the ietf-dkim