[ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 errata
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at sendmail.com
Tue Sep 30 12:10:05 PDT 2008
To answer the question about what current implementations do, I can speak
Regarding erratum 1383, we responded to the consensus and allow "*"
anywhere, and more than once, in the "g=" value.
Regarding erratum 1378, we always include the "a=" in our generated
signatures and require them when verifying, treating their absence as an
error. I would have no problem changing this behaviour to favour what
section 3.3 says if that's consensus.
More information about the ietf-dkim