[ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 errata

[Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com]

In particular, my earlier email (two months ago) identified 
two errata (1383 and 1378) that deserve a closer look:

http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q3/010664.html

(For these two, I'd be hesitant to assume that silence 
means everyone's OK with them.)

Best regards,
Pasi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org 
> [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of ext 
> Stephen Farrell
> Sent: 29 September, 2008 12:44
> To: ietf-dkim
> Subject: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 errata
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We need to give Pasi guidance on the WG's opinion of the
> various errata [1] that've been posted for RFC 4871.
> 
> Most of these were generated as a result of the good interop
> work done earlier, so this should hopefully be easy.
> 
> We need to tell Pasi if we think the errata as posted
> should be accepted and if so, whether the proposed
> change and accompanying notes are ok or not. If the
> text needs changing then we need to generate the new
> text required. (Since this could take some time, please
> don't try to e.g. polish the notes text so that its
> totally nice and shiny:-)
> 
> If there are ones we need to discuss, please start
> a new thread for each. Once that's settled down, I'll
> send out a mail looking for some +1's on the entire set.
> (If no-one comments on any of them in two weeks, i.e.
> by 2008-10-13, then I'll send out that message
> anyway.)
> 
> After that's all done, we'll want to think about whether
> to do a 4871bis with the changes or a delta or whatever,
> but that's for later.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephen.
> 
> [1] http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4871&eid=
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>