[ietf-dkim] Issue 1543: remove [FWS]

[Frank Ellermann]

Jim Fenton wrote:
     
>> Close the ticket as soon as *FWS is replaced by either
>> *WSP or [FWS].
 
> Well, OK, but I'll point out that when the ticket was
> opened, the text said [FWS].

Yes, and the submitter of this ticket found that there
are far worse things than [FWS] when he saw the *FWS ;-)

Apparently folks agree that [FWS] in DNS is nonsense, but
in line with RFC 4871:  Ordre, contreordre, désordre.

 Frank