[ietf-dkim] Issue 1561: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language

[Dave Crocker]

Just to make sure I understand:

    The decision is to remove all hints of being normative?  (Per the recent 
exchange on the IETF mailing list, this won't hinge on case.)


d/

Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Issue description: https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1561
> 
> Thread: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q1/009790.html
> 
>  From the thread people seem to support the thrust of the comment, i.e.
> to reduce/eliminate 2119 language where possible and definitely
> avoid it (regardless of case) where its not needed.
> 
> Suggest we leave this open for now to let the editors concentrate
> on the overview and process the deployment draft issue subsequently.
> 
> S.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
> 

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net