[ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00
Stephen Farrell
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Mon May 26 03:30:36 PDT 2008
Arvel Hathcock wrote:
> Let's just get on with having the chairs conduct a straw-poll. The
> question is pathetically simple: Should the next draft of the working
> group document retain the NXDOMAIN check or not? Yes or no. This is
> really easy folks.
>
> If there is insufficient consensus either way then we can either give up
> or work toward some compromise language.
I plan to start such a strawpoll (*) this week. I just want to check the
wording of the question with the authors of draft-ietf-dkim-ssp first
to make sure they're happy they'll be able to take action based on
whatever results we get.
Stephen.
(*) Actually, a couple of people have asked me to use the term
"consensus call" instead of strawpoll. I don't mind either way, but
just so everyone's clear, I think these amount to the same thing
in a case like this where we've some specific text we do or don't
want to keep/change.
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list