[ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00

Stephen Farrell stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Mon May 26 03:30:36 PDT 2008



Arvel Hathcock wrote:
> Let's just get on with having the chairs conduct a straw-poll.  The 
> question is pathetically simple:  Should the next draft of the working 
> group document retain the NXDOMAIN check or not?  Yes or no.  This is 
> really easy folks.
> 
> If there is insufficient consensus either way then we can either give up 
> or work toward some compromise language.

I plan to start such a strawpoll (*) this week. I just want to check the
wording of the question with the authors of draft-ietf-dkim-ssp first
to make sure they're happy they'll be able to take action based on
whatever results we get.

Stephen.

(*) Actually, a couple of people have asked me to use the term
"consensus call" instead of strawpoll. I don't mind either way, but
just so everyone's clear, I think these amount to the same thing
in a case like this where we've some specific text we do or don't
want to keep/change.



More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list