First quarter 2008 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Jan 1 15:15:28 PST 2008
Ending: Mon Mar 31 19:29:26 PDT 2008
Messages: 1052

• [ietf-dkim] SSP + SPF records in DNS (was: New Issue: Do we need SSP record for DKIM=unknown?)   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP + SPF records in DNS   Julian Mehnle
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP + SPF records in DNS   Julian Mehnle
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP + SPF records in DNS   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP + SPF records in DNS   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP + SPF records in DNS   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP + SPF records in DNS   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP + SPF records in DNS   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] So...what's the current consensus?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Meeting at next IETF   Stephen Farrell
  • [ietf-dkim] DKIM WG Page Messed Up?   Livingood, Jason
    • [ietf-dkim] DKIM WG Page Messed Up?   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] DKIM WG Page Messed Up?   Tony Hansen
    • [ietf-dkim] DKIM WG Page Messed Up?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Issue #1541 - Do we need SSP record for DKIM=unknown?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: SSP Restrictive Policies Recommendation for an RFC 4871 update   Hector Santos
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: SSP Restrictive Policies Recommendation for an RFC 4871 update   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: SSP Restrictive Policies Recommendation for an RFC 4871 update   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: SSP Restrictive Policies Recommendationfor an RFC 4871 update   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] SHA256 not supported on Windows XP/2000/NT   Hector Santos
  • [ietf-dkim] SHA256 not supported on Windows XP/2000/NT   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] SHA256 not supported on Windows XP/2000/NT   Mircea Purdea
• [ietf-dkim] Possible issue with Parent Domain logic in SSP   robert at barclayfamily.com
  • [ietf-dkim] Possible issue with Parent Domain logic in SSP   Jim Fenton
    • [ietf-dkim] Possible issue with Parent Domain logic in SSP   robert at barclayfamily.com
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: Possible issue with Parent Domain logic in SSP   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Possible issue with Parent Domain logic in SSP   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Possible issue with Parent Domain logic in SSP   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Possible issue with Parent Domain logic in SSP   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Some concerns with SSP impact on very small businesses   Siegel, Ellen
  • [ietf-dkim] Some concerns with SSP impact on very small businesses   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] Some concerns with SSP impact on very small businesses   Jim Fenton
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: Some concerns with SSP impact on very small businesses   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Some concerns with SSP impact on very small businesses   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Some concerns with SSP impact on verysmall businesses   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Some concerns with SSP impact on very small businesses   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] Some concerns with SSP impact on very small businesses   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Some concerns with SSP impact on very small businesses   Mark Martinec
• [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   Stephen Farrell
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP issues status   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP issues status   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: remove [FWS] (was: SSP issues status)   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: remove [FWS] (was: SSP issues status)   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: remove [FWS]   Michael Thomas
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Mark Delany
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation (was: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages)   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation (was: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages)   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1521 will damage DKIM/SSP   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP vs. reputation   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP vs. reputation   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP vs. reputation   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP vs. reputation   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Reputation vs SSP   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Mark Delany
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Hector Santos
      • reputation is orthogonal (RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages)   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Jeff Macdonald
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Scott Kitterman
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSPtounsigned messages   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSPtounsigned messages   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSPtounsigned messages   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] The first Internet mailing list   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the entire world will change their mail systems so that SSP sort of works   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP tounsigned messages   Damon
  • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   Barry Leiba
    • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP issues status   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Issue:1519 SSP-01 Unnecessary constraint on i= when asserting "strict"   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] Issue:1519 SSP-01 Unnecessary constraint on i= when asserting "strict"   Jim Fenton
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue:1519 SSP-01 Unnecessary constraint on i= when asserting "strict"   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871: Signature Expiration   Florian Sager
  • [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871: Signature Expiration   John Levine
    • [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871: Signature Expiration   Florian Sager
• [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871: Signature Expiration   Florian Sager
• [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • 1:1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics)   J D Falk
      • 1:1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics)   Scott Kitterman
      • 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics)   John Levine
      • 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics)   Jim Fenton
      • 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics)   John L
      • 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics)   Jim Fenton
      • 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics)   John L
      • 1: 1 (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthorbreaks email semantics)   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   Scott Kitterman
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] OT: 300, 000 bounces (was: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties)   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] OT: 300, 000 bounces (was: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties)   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: OT: 300,000 bounces   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: OT: 300,000 bounces   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: 1: 1 and assertions about third parties   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Jon Callas
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingbyfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingbyfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingbyfirstAuthorbreaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingbyfirstAuthorbreaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Scott Kitterman
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics)   J D Falk
      • MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics)   Dave Crocker
      • MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics)   Michael Thomas
      • MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics)   Dave Crocker
      • MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics)   Michael Thomas
      • MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics)   Dave Crocker
      • MUA (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to postingby firstAuthor breaks email semantics)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] 1534 (was: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics)   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   SM
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- combine Arvel's, Doug's, and John's ideas (?)   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- combine Arvel's, Doug's, and John's ideas (?)   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- combine Arvel's, Doug's, and John's ideas (?)   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jon Callas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jon Callas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   robert at barclayfamily.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jeff Macdonald
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jeff Macdonald
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] DNS delegation takes care of the authorization   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1542: SSP Restrictive Policies Recommendation for an RFC 4871 update   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Jeff Macdonald
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthor breaks email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthorbreaks email semantics   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthorbreaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting byfirstAuthorbreaks email semantics   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] email semantics (was: ISSUE 1525 [...])   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: email semantics   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by firstAuthor breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Charles Lindsey
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Restriction to posting by first Author breaks email semantics   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] No teleconference   DKIM Chair
  • [ietf-dkim] No teleconference   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
    • [ietf-dkim] No teleconference   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP version numbers   Michael Thomas
  • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP version numbers   Steve Atkins
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP version numbers   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: replace use of term "suspicious"   Arvel Hathcock
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: replace use of term "suspicious"   Arvel Hathcock
  • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: replace use of term "suspicious"   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: replace use of term "suspicious"   Arvel Hathcock
  • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: replace use of term "suspicious"   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM performance metrics studies?   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   J D Falk
  • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Steve Atkins
    • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Eliot Lear
    • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Matthew Joseff
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously.   Frank Ellermann
  • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Tony Finch
    • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Barry Leiba
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Jon Callas
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Jon Callas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously.   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously.   Jon Callas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously.   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   Scott Kitterman
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Srsly.   Siegel, Ellen
      • reasons to ignore valid SSP (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Srsly.)   J D Falk
      • reasons to ignore valid SSP (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Srsly.)   Steve Atkins
      • reasons to ignore valid SSP (was RE: [ietf-dkim] Srsly.)   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Michael Thomas
      • New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously.)   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields as input to SSP   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields asinput to SSP   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: signed vs. unsigned header fields asinput to SSP   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously.   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the more reliable signature fallacy   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the more reliable signature fallacy   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the more reliable signature fallacy   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: the more reliable signature fallacy   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously.   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   SM
• [ietf-dkim] quick test   J.D. Falk
  • [ietf-dkim] quick test   J D Falk
    • [ietf-dkim] quick test   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] quick test   Tony Hansen
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: quick test   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: quick test   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: quick test   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] adding DKIM to Thunderbird 'verification' extension   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Audian Paxson
  • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
• [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?   Charles Lindsey
    • [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?   Stephen Farrell
    • [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?   Douglas Otis
      • ***SPAM-3*** Re: [ietf-dkim] What is your view on these three SSP topics?   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Associated Signatures   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Associated Signatures   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Associated Signatures   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Associated Signatures   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   SM
  • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   John Levine
  • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   robert at barclayfamily.com
• [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   hsantos at santronics.com
  • [ietf-dkim] Seriously.   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy   hsantos at santronics.com
• [ietf-dkim] the more reliable signature fallacy   hsantos at santronics.com
• [ietf-dkim] Using SUBMITTER (RFC 4405) as a SSP discovery   hsantos at santronics.com
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: Using SUBMITTER (RFC 4405) as a SSP discovery   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: Using SUBMITTER (RFC 4405) as a SSP discovery   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Using SUBMITTER (RFC 4405) as a SSP discovery   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages   Michael Thomas
  • [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages   Damon
    • [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] Price of Rice in China   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Tony Finch
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Frank Ellermann
  • [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages   John Levine
  • [ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Bug or Feature   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Paul Hoffman
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: A proposal for restructuring SSP   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: A proposal for restructuring SSP   Jeff Macdonald
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: A proposal for restructuring SSP   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: A proposal for restructuring SSP   Jeff Macdonald
  • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Charles Lindsey
  • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
    • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Scott Kitterman
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Scott Kitterman
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Scott Kitterman
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP   Jim Fenton
• Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Charles Lindsey
  • Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Paul Hoffman
    • Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Michael Thomas
      • Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com
      • Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Hector Santos
      • Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Re: from'less 2822 messages   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Re: from'less 2822 messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Re: from'less 2822 messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Re: from'less 2822 messages   Damon
    • Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Draft of ASP, Author Signing Policy   John L
  • [ietf-dkim] Draft of ASP, Author Signing Policy   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Douglas Otis
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt (issue 1519?)   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt (issue 1519?)   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt (issue 1519?)   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt (issue 1519?)   Douglas Otis
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Author Signature Definition   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Graham Murray
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Eric Allman
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Eric Allman
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Eric Allman
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] DEAD HORSE: SSP failure scenarios   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Ignoring SSP failure scenarios is harmful   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] DEAD HORSE: SSP failure scenarios   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt ASP/SSP section 2.8   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Optional sender (was: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt)   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Optional sender   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Optional sender   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Optional sender   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Optional sender   Pete Resnick
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Optional sender   Hector Santos
  • [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Arvel Hathcock
    • [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Wietse Venema
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Michael Thomas
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Jon Callas
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02 DKIM=ALL a Flawed Concept   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02 DKIM=ALL a Flawed Concept   J D Falk
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Steve Atkins
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   John Levine
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] poison signatures, was draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] The good, the bad and the ugly - was poison signatures   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • forgeries (Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP)   dhc at dcrocker.net
      • forgeries (Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP)   Hector Santos
      • forgeries (Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP)   Wietse Venema
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] Agenda slots in Philly   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Return to issues?   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] Return to issues?   Michael Thomas
  • [ietf-dkim] Return to issues?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-08.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] DKIM slashdotted   Frank Ellermann
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-overview-08 (was: DKIM slashdotted)   Tony Hansen
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: draft-ietf-dkim-overview-08   Frank Ellermann
  • [ietf-dkim] DKIM slashdotted   Jon Callas
    • [ietf-dkim] DKIM slashdotted   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action   Hector Santos
      • SSP-02 Process Concerns (was Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action)   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] Unacceptable (was: ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action)   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Unacceptable (was: ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action)   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] Unacceptable   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Unacceptable   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: Unacceptable   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Unacceptable (was: ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action)   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Unacceptable (was: ISSUE: SSP-02: Discardableinappropriately specifies possible verifier action)   Siegel, Ellen
    • [ietf-dkim] Unacceptable   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] Unacceptable   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Unacceptable   J D Falk
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Policies Required to close security threats   Hector Santos
  • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Policies Required to close security threats   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threats are well defined   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third Party Senders   Hector Santos
  • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   J D Falk
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected ThirdPartySenders   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected ThirdPartySenders   J D Falk
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third Party Senders   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected ThirdPartySenders   Siegel, Ellen
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected ThirdPartySenders   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected ThirdPartySenders   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected ThirdPartySenders   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: Security Threat: Unexpected Third PartySenders   J D Falk
• [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02:Author Signature scope too narrow (Updates ISSUE 1519)   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02:Author Signature scope too narrow (Updates ISSUE 1519)   Charles Lindsey
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1519: SSP-02:Author Signature scope too narrow   Jim Fenton
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1519: SSP-02:Author Signature scope too narrow   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1519: SSP-02:Author Signature scope too narrow   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1519: SSP-02:Author Signature scope too narrow   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Charles Lindsey
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Wietse Venema
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduceDNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduceDNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduceDNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduceDNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Jon Callas
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Damon
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandate to reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detect fraudulent messages   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Arvel Hathcock
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   John Levine
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Hector Santos
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Wietse Venema
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Jim Fenton
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Eliot Lear
  • Issue Tracker down Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Eliot Lear
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue Tracker down   Jim Fenton
    • Issue Tracker down Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] ADMIN: Mipassoc. org mailing list host change -- 2/16-17   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Wietse Venema
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Wietse Venema
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   dhc at dcrocker.net
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Re: NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] ***SPAM-3*** Re: NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope // defaults   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] ***SPAM-3*** Re: NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope // defaults   Charles Lindsey
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope //defaults   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope //defaults   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP-02: Policy Scope // defaults   Douglas Otis
    • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   SM
• [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: NEW ISSUE: SSP-02: Policy Scope   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADMIN: MIPAssoc.Org and DKIM.Org mailing list host change -- 2/16-17: 1-6pm Pacific tme   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] ADMIN: MIPAssoc.Org and DKIM.Org mailing list host change -- 2/16-17: 1-6pm Pacific tme   Dave Crocker
• No subject  
• [ietf-dkim] ADMIN: MIPAssoc.Org and DKIM.Org mailing list host change -- 2/16-17: 1-6pm Pacific tme   dcrocker at bbiw.net
• [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1547: SSP-02: MX Record publishing mandateto reduce DNS overhead for SSP Discovery and to detectfraudulent messages   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] SSP-02 the problem with Author Signature   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] SSP-02 the problem with Author Signature   Douglas Otis
    • [ietf-dkim] SSP-02 the problem with Author Signature   Jeff Macdonald
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP-02 the problem with Author Signature   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP-02 the problem with Author Signature   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP-02 the problem with Author Signature   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP-02 the problem with Author Signature   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] SSP-02 the problem with Author Signature   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Thom O'Connor
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   SM
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   John Levine
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   SM
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt Discardable/Exclusive   Damon
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-03.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   John Levine
  • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   Damon
  • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   Al Iverson
  • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   SM
      • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] discardable means discardable   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-crocker-email-arch-10.txt]   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
  • [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09.txt   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09.txt   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-01.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
  • [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-01.txt   Tony Hansen
  • [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-01.txt   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] tpa-ssp label generating utility   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Florian Sager
  • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Murray S. Kucherawy
    • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Florian Sager
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Murray S. Kucherawy
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   SM
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Florian Sager
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reportingaddress (fwd)   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reportingaddress (fwd)   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Draft DKIM meeting agenda   Stephen Farrell
  • [ietf-dkim] Draft DKIM meeting agenda   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • [ietf-dkim] Draft DKIM meeting agenda   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Stephen Farrell
    • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Eliot Lear
  • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Douglas Otis
    • [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd)   John Levine
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd)   Michael Thomas
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd)   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd)   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] name existence vs ASP   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] name existence vs ASP   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1547: MX records (was: ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check)   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1547: MX records (was: ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check)   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1547: MX records (was: ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check)   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd)   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd)   Jim Fenton
    • [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd)   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
      • [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd)   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [ietf-dkim] Request for IPv6 testers to dkim.org and mipassoc.org   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Wording in draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09   Eric Allman
  • [ietf-dkim] Wording in draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] Wording in draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] WGLC on overview document   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft   John Levine
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft   Jim Fenton
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1553: note on figure in overview draft   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft   John L
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Draft summary for IETF 71 DKIM meeting   DKIM Chair
  • [ietf-dkim] Draft summary for IETF 71 DKIM meeting   Michael Thomas
    • [ietf-dkim] Draft summary for IETF 71 DKIM meeting   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Stephen Farrell
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Jon Callas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Al Iverson
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority   Stephen Farrell
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Douglas Otis
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Barry Leiba
      • [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...)   J D Falk
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Eric Allman
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Wietse Venema
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Eric Allman
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Mark Delany
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Steve Atkins
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Barry Leiba
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2)   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] policy compliance at domain or identity   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"   Murray S. Kucherawy
  • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"   Arvel Hathcock
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"   Arvel Hathcock
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: "Prior work" in the overview memo   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Appendix A in "overview"   Frank Ellermann
  • [ietf-dkim] sender-auth-header (was: New Issue: Appendix A in "overview")   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: perpetrate abuse in "overview"   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview"   Frank Ellermann
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview"   Siegel, Ellen
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview"   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview"   Frank Ellermann
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview"   Wietse Venema
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview"   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] For info   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work   Hector Santos
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work   Hector Santos
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work   Douglas Otis
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] [dkim unverified] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] sender-auth-header   Murray S. Kucherawy
  • [ietf-dkim] sender-auth-header   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] What's the errata process for RFC4871?   Mark Delany
  • [ietf-dkim] What's the errata process for RFC4871?   SM
    • [ietf-dkim] What's the errata process for RFC4871?   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] TPA-label draft updated   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minor editing   J D Falk
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minor editing   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minor editing   Frank Ellermann
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minor editing   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minorediting   Frank Ellermann
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity   J D Falk
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity   Al Iverson
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] New issue: overview doc mentions signing policies, but leaves us hanging   J D Falk
  • [ietf-dkim] New issue: overview doc mentions signing policies, but leaves us hanging   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New issue: overview doc mentions signing policies, but leaves us hanging   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] New issue: overview doc mentions signing policies, but leaves us hanging   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: "Mediator" used before defined in overview doc   J D Falk
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: "Mediator" used before defined in overview doc   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] fyi: new issues delay...   Eliot Lear
  • [ietf-dkim] fyi: new issues delay...   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-14.txt]   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Stephen Farrell
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Frank Ellermann
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Wietse Venema
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Tony Hansen
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   John Levine
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Eric Allman
    • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Nick Edwards
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Siegel, Ellen
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Charles Lindsey
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Douglas Otis
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   John Levine
      • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Hector Santos
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Arvel Hathcock
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   SM
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Sandy Wills
    • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Sandy Wills
      • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Steve Atkins
      • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Scott Kitterman
      • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Douglas Otis
      • [ietf-dkim] something else (was: Re: Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550))   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   John Levine
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   J D Falk
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Jeff Macdonald
  • [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language   Eliot Lear
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language   John Levine
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guideimproperly uses normative language   J D Falk
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Treatment of verification failure not really a goal   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Treatment of verification failure not really a goal   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Treatment of verification failure not really a goal   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Issue #1553: note on figure in overview draft   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1553: note on figure in overview draft   Jim Fenton
    • [ietf-dkim] Issue #1553: note on figure in overview draft   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Mark Delany
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Tony Hansen
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Mark Delany
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Mark Delany
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Tony Hansen
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Tony Hansen
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section   Jim Fenton
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Overview and Signing vs. Practices (was Re: New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section)   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] Overview and Signing vs. Practices (was Re: New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section)   Jim Fenton
      • [ietf-dkim] Overview and Signing vs. Practices (was Re: New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section)   Dave Crocker
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] dkim-overview-09 /authentication scope per derivatives   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] dkim-overview-09/ Verification   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language   SM
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions   Stephen Farrell
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions   Siegel, Ellen
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions   Stephen Farrell
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview   Stephen Farrell
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview   Dave Crocker
    • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview   Stephen Farrell
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview   Dave Crocker
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview   Jeff Macdonald
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview   Eliot Lear
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview   J D Falk
      • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Even more overview editorials   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] [psg.com #1570] [Comment] Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section   rt+dkim at rt.psg.com

Last message date: Mon Mar 31 19:29:26 PDT 2008
Archived on: Mon Mar 31 19:29:34 PDT 2008

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...