[ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
MHammer at ag.com
Wed Mar 19 17:36:06 PDT 2008
No objections here.
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 8:00 PM
To: J D Falk
Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention
J D Falk wrote:
>> Here's core question with this sort of overview: It can include too
>> much tutorial about basic technology, rather than focusing on the
>> specifics of the technology it is meant to describe. Some pedagogy
>> needed, but how much?
> I've been noticing that data integrity (much better term, thanks) is
> often forgotten when discussing DKIM, yet it's clearly very important
> some senders. Section 2 is basically "what will DKIM do for me?" --
> I think it should be included there.
does anyone object to the proposed change?
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
More information about the ietf-dkim