[ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity

[MH Michael Hammer (5304)]

No objections here.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 8:00 PM
To: J D Falk
Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention
message validity



J D Falk wrote:
>> Here's core question with this sort of overview:  It can include too
>> much tutorial about basic technology, rather than focusing on the
>> specifics of the technology it is meant to describe.  Some pedagogy
is
>> needed, but how much?
> 
> I've been noticing that data integrity (much better term, thanks) is
> often forgotten when discussing DKIM, yet it's clearly very important
to
> some senders.  Section 2 is basically "what will DKIM do for me?" --
so
> I think it should be included there.



point taken.

does anyone object to the proposed change?

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html