[ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reportingaddress (fwd)

[J D Falk]

John Levine wisely repeated:

>  SSP desperately needs real life experience before we start twiddling
it.
> 
> I'd like to go with the current modest version and come back after
> we've found out what's useful and what isn't.

+1

> The reporting address sounds like a fine idea, but as we've already
> seen there's all sorts of questions that would benefit from
> experience, like how much you redact, and to what extent asking for
> reports would be an invitation to be mailbombed.

I'd think we can gain reporting experience on an ad-hoc basis without
outwardly modifying ASP.  This is probably more of an interop topic,
though.

--
J.D. Falk
Receiver Products
Return Path