[ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)

[Dave Crocker]

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Florian Sager wrote:
>> Thanks for this reminder, I forgot about this draft: maybe section 4.1 
>> can be extended by s.th. like "a Reports are requested for passed 
>> signatures inside mails with suspicious content". The same intent may 
>> already be included in 4.2 "s ... signed and Suspicious".
> 
> Not a bad idea.  Any comments from others?


It's unrelated to the existing published information.

That doesn't mean that it is a bad idea, but it does mean that it inherently 
expands the scope of the current ASP draft.

Since,

      a) reporting is a topic still being developed and is broader than this one 
idea, and

      b) ASP provides an extensible mechanism for later enhancement,

this seems like a fine topic for... later enhancement.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net