[ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP
pbaker at verisign.com
Tue Feb 12 10:23:52 PST 2008
+1 sort of.
I agree that the term sender is misleading: it could correspond to a
But author might also have somewhat loaded semantics. Are we looking for
something like 'originator'.
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Arvel Hathcock
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 12:38 PM
To: DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Rename SSP to ASP
> As such, the name of the specification should reflect its precise
scope. The > current name of "Sender" Signing Practices is imprecise
> The name should be changed to Author Signing Practices (ASP).
+1 for all the reasons Dave mentioned.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
More information about the ietf-dkim