[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt

[Douglas Otis]

This draft goes to the opposite extreme of the ASP draft and increases  
the restrictions for "all" compliance as well. This draft indicates  
_ALL_ messages are to include a signature with an i= parameter matches  
that of an identity within the From header.  This is not the defined  
use for RFC 4871.

The ASP approach creates fewer corner cases.  At least with the ASP  
draft, any risk of misuse remains within the control of a domain to  
rectify.

IMHO, unless the SSP draft is changed to comply with RFC 4871, the WG  
should consider adopting the ASP draft instead.

-Doug