[ietf-dkim] Re: A proposal for restructuring SSP
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Wed Jan 30 06:34:33 PST 2008
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
> would this be a 5.7.x enhanced status code?
notes that X.7.1 is associated with 550 pointing to RFC 3463 for
| X.7.1 Delivery not authorized, message refused
| The sender is not authorized to send to the destination. This
| can be the result of per-host or per-recipient filtering. This
| memo does not discuss the merits of any such filtering, but
| provides a mechanism to report such. This is useful only as a
| permanent error.
5.7.0 is apparently too unspecific. In theory SSP could create
its own 5.7.x if the eight existing codes are not good enough:
More information about the ietf-dkim