Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages
deepvoice at gmail.com
Mon Jan 28 10:49:34 PST 2008
On Jan 28, 2008 1:30 PM, Hector Santos <hsantos at santronics.com> wrote:
> ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
> > But beyond that, I have to say I'm a bit confounded by the concern for
> > invalid messages shown here. There are a gazillion ways for messages
> > to be invalid and attempting to account for them all in our
> > specifications is a practical impossibility. And yet many members
> > of this group seem to have no problem blithely ignoring various
> > legitimate protocol features. I find this dichotomy to be more
> > than a little perflexing.
I am VERY sorry if I had anything to do with this thread going as long
as it did.
My reply to the first message was just to clear up my confusion.
More information about the ietf-dkim