Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: from'less 2822 messages

[Damon]

On Jan 28, 2008 1:30 PM, Hector Santos <hsantos at santronics.com> wrote:
> ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
>
> > But beyond that, I have to say I'm a bit confounded by the concern for
> > invalid messages shown here. There are a gazillion ways for messages
>  > to be invalid and attempting to account for them all in our
>  > specifications is a practical impossibility. And yet many members
>  > of this group seem to have no problem blithely ignoring various
>  > legitimate protocol features. I find this dichotomy to be more
>  > than a little perflexing.
>
> +1.
>


+1,000,000
I am VERY sorry if I had anything to do with this thread going as long
as it did.
My reply to the first message was just to clear up my confusion.

Regards,
Damon