[ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

Yes, which is why I stopped following the mailing list closely until I realized that some folks presented Ideas even more harmful to my business model. Jim's post that I was responding to did mention 3rd party, negatively, so I was once again trying to bring to the attention of everyone that without third party signing large ISP's have zero interest in DKIM signing or SSP. 
thanks,
Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: John Levine [mailto:johnl at iecc.com]
Sent: Sat 1/26/2008 9:46 PM
To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org; Oxley, Bill (CCI-Atlanta)
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP
 
>I will state <LOUDLY> that without the ability to handle 3rd party
>signing statements, SSP is useless to me.</LOUDLY>

You know that hasn't been in any of the drafts, don't you?

R's,
John