[ietf-dkim] Reputation vs SSP

Douglas Otis dotis at mail-abuse.org
Thu Jan 24 19:34:17 PST 2008


On Jan 24, 2008, at 6:14 PM, Hector Santos wrote:

> Its unfortunate that it has nothing to do with technical reasons but  
> the powers that are pushing reputations instead. The fact is, Dave's  
> never cared for SSP and its spelled out in his deployment guide, and  
> the other guy pushing his reputation service has no room for SSP  
> because SSP threatens that service business.
>
> It is would be one thing to kill SSP for its technical merits, but  
> no one has SHOWN it is flawed system. NO one.
>
> Purely based on self interest, and unfortunately we have a few cogs  
> who are masters of getting things KILLED if they want it to DIE.
>
> It is a very SAD that not enough the technical developers are here  
> to mandate the direction.
>
> It is really a sad. Too bad.  Such a GOOD system is going thrown  
> away because of the self-interest reputations pushers.

Hector,

To avoid unwarranted disruption, SSP should be defined in a manner  
that permits RFC 4871 to be used as expected when making SSP  
assertions like "all" or "strict".

SSP will not impact reputation services.  It is hard to imagine how  
your conclusion was reached.  Spammers have proven themselves able to  
adjust to these types of mechanisms.  Nevertheless, DKIM deployment is  
important for many reasons well beyond reputation and self-published  
policy enforcement.

As SSP is currently defined, normal use of RFC 4871 is not possible.   
The self inflicted problems will diminish DKIM's deployment.

You have often described an ability to reject email based upon self  
published policy as a significant benefit that will be provided by  
DKIM.  (The batteries.)  However, the extent of this benefit may be  
less than you have imagined.  In addition, having DKIM deployed  
provides significant benefits you are likely overlooking.

IMHO, the motivations behind the SSP discussion is to ensure this  
policy extension does not become problematic for the more important  
DKIM base deployment.

SSP will happen.  The goal is to have SSP offer more benefits than  
problems.

-Doug


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list