[ietf-dkim] from'less 2822 messages

[Michael Thomas]

Damon wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 8:02 PM, Michael Thomas <mike at mtcc.com> wrote:
>> I don't think this is handled in the current spec, but it's certainly
>> possible to get delivered an otherwise valid 2822 message that doesn't
>> have a From: address (or a null header field). What should an
>> implementation do in this case?
>>
>>                Mike
>> _______________________________________________
> 
> Such as a bounce?


I thought that a bounce was a MAIL FROM: <> ? I don't recall seeing a
null 822 From:, but I could easily be wrong.

		Mike