[ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages

[Arvel Hathcock]

 > The original proposal in the issue, "All text that causes SSP to be
 > applied to an already-signed message needs to be removed," could be
 > interpreted as discouraging the use of SSP anytime there is any valid
 > signature on a message.

That is precisely what I understand this proposal to be advocating.  If 
I'm wrong I would love some clarification.

Arvel