[ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: SSP version numbers

[Steve Atkins]

On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:

>
> Considering that this draft is already pretty different than the
> original pre-ietf version, and it's likely to change more before
> we issue an RFC, can we please have a version number in the RR
> so that the software can track the changes?
>
> I'm happy with the way that DKIM did it, ie pre-rfc v=SSP0.n
> where n == draft number, and rfc is v=SSP1.

We'd need to specify recipient behaviour in the case of
unrecognized versions too.

Cheers,
   Steve