[ietf-dkim] Re: ISSUE 1521 -- Limit the application of SSP to
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Wed Jan 16 06:34:01 PST 2008
Dave Crocker wrote:
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> The attached contains our view on the current list of SSP issues 
>> for those opened in the last week or so. (Sorry the formatting's a bit
>> Can you check that these seem ok, or comment where they don't?
>> 1521 Limit the application of SSP to unsigned messages new
>> dkim Nobody 0
>> dhc at dcrocker.net 9 days ago 9 days ago 0
>> Proposal: REJECT, but some wording changes may be needed for the next
>> thread is  I mainly saw opposition to the change suggested in the
>> and little support, but some text clarifying changes were suggested (e.g.
>>  http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2007q4/008424.html
>>  http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2007q4/008467.html
> Would you please explain the basis for assessing that this topic got
> sufficient discussion and that there was rough consensus on it?
See above "I mainly saw..."
> This is perhaps the most fundamental issue on the list, so it would be
> advisable that we be quite careful about its consideration and resolution.
Sure. It'd be fine if others also go back through the thread and
see what they think and/or continue the discussion if that's needed.
More information about the ietf-dkim