[ietf-dkim] SSP issues status
Jim Fenton
fenton at cisco.com
Tue Jan 15 14:22:33 PST 2008
Back on December 11, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> We're looking at scheduling 1 hour calls each Thursday
> in Jan (i.e. 3rd, 10th, 17th, 24th and 31st) at 1700 UTC.
>
Dave Crocker wrote:
> So effectively the issue has changed from whether 30 days notice
> really is required to whether what is really only 3 is somehow
> acceptable. (RFC2418, Section 3.1
I penciled in the meetings when they were originally proposed, not sure
why this is a surprise to people. January 3 and 10 got cancelled for
various reasons (proximity to the holidays and lack of 30-day notice, I
think) but the rest are still there.
-Jim
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list