[ietf-dkim] SSP issues status

Jim Fenton fenton at cisco.com
Tue Jan 15 14:22:33 PST 2008


Back on December 11, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> We're looking at scheduling 1 hour calls each Thursday
> in Jan (i.e. 3rd, 10th, 17th, 24th and 31st) at 1700 UTC.
>   


Dave Crocker wrote:
> So effectively the issue has changed from whether 30 days notice 
> really is required to whether what is really only 3 is somehow 
> acceptable.  (RFC2418, Section 3.1

I penciled in the meetings when they were originally proposed, not sure 
why this is a surprise to people.  January 3 and 10 got cancelled for 
various reasons (proximity to the holidays and lack of 30-day notice, I 
think) but the rest are still there.

-Jim



More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list