[ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Do we need SSP record for DKIM=unknown?
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Thu Dec 27 16:29:30 PST 2007
Jim Fenton wrote:
> The SSP extension to key records would never be sufficient;
> stand-alone SSP records would need to be published as well.
> I'd like to suggest that we concentrate on the "basic" SSP
> concept for now and keep optimizations such as this for
> discussion later.
+1 It's kind of obvious that for *some* receivers and *some*
mails it might help to offer an "SSP-accelerator" in SPF, as
proposed by Scott (in 2006 IIRC). No issue for this WG. ;-)
More information about the ietf-dkim