[ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1530 - replace use of term "suspicious"

[Eliot Lear]

Hector,
>>
>> +1 for "Whatever" as the descriptive term.
>
> hahahahaha!
>
> So much for getting the "easy issues" out of the way. :-)
>


Bingo.  We are wasting time on what I think is an extraordinary
superficial issue.  Jim's original term "Suspicious" was defined within
the document, and did not in itself mean that the message was a forgery
- just that extra care is needed.  I wonder whether there really is a
developer who would be confused by the term and not know what to do.  If
so, please explain why you are confused by the text.

Eliot