[ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1530 - replace use of term "suspicious"
lear at cisco.com
Tue Dec 18 22:27:55 PST 2007
>> +1 for "Whatever" as the descriptive term.
> So much for getting the "easy issues" out of the way. :-)
Bingo. We are wasting time on what I think is an extraordinary
superficial issue. Jim's original term "Suspicious" was defined within
the document, and did not in itself mean that the message was a forgery
- just that extra care is needed. I wonder whether there really is a
developer who would be confused by the term and not know what to do. If
so, please explain why you are confused by the text.
More information about the ietf-dkim